and MeSH terms for “pain” and “manikin” to identify original studies in English that used a digital pain manikin for collecting information from adults with any condition. We extracted and descriptively synthesised data on the characteristics of studies and digital pain manikins and mapped them to a stage of the translational pathway (ie, design, testing, metric validation, and diffusion). We screened 6,189 articles, of which we included 104. Articles reported on 31 unique digital pain manikins. Most studies were conducted in Europe (n = 60; 58%), recruited people with pain/painful conditions (n = 69; 66%) from clinical settings (n = 67; 64%). Of the 31 manikins, the majority were two-dimensional (n = 21; 68%) with a front and back body view (n = 18; 58%) and allowed users to draw their pain on any area of the manikin (n = 23; 74%). Most manikins were still in the development and testing stages (n = 23; 74%). Only eight (26%) had progressed fully through the translational pathway, taki