• Mashup Score: 0

    “Not long ago—and you can’t even believe these numbers—one in 10 000 children have autism . . . And now it’s one in 36. There’s something wrong,” Donald Trump told the US Congress on 4 March. Since he took office for the second time in January 2025 autism has been on the agenda for both Trump and Robert F Kennedy Jr. The US health secretary has controversially spoken out on the issue, linking childhood vaccines to autism and advocating alternative, often unproved, treatments. In a press event on 18 April Kennedy said that people with autism “will never pay taxes, they’ll never hold a job, they’ll never play baseball, they’ll never write a poem, they’ll never go on a date, many of them will never use a toilet unassisted.” In March Kennedy’s Department for Health and Human Services (HHS) announced that the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will conduct a large study to investigate a possible link between vaccines …

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Autism has been on the agenda for both Donald Trump and Robert F Kennedy Jr. What has been announced, and what has been the response? https://t.co/zncFSGLkqV

  • Mashup Score: 1

    We must unite against harmful cuts and work towards a society that values Disabled people as equal citizens, writes Fazilet Hadi I have been a Disabled person since losing my sight in my teenage years. I wanted to hide my impairment at first. I felt anxious and uncomfortable and viewed it as a deficit. It took time for me to realise that I had internalised the ableist attitudes that surrounded me and that I had as much right as everyone else to exist and be accepted for who I am. Ableism is powerful: it leads us to view Disabled people as “other” and “lesser.” We are neither; we make up 25% of the UK population and should be treated as equal citizens.1 Society needs to redesign itself with us in mind. Successive governments frame our existence as a problem and have failed to ensure our inclusion. The current Labour government’s blaming of disabled people for the country’s economic …

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • The government claims it is trying to fix a “broken benefits system,” but it is the hostile and discriminatory culture and systems that need to be fixed. The UK government’s disability benefit cuts are cruel and unfair, writes @FaziletHadi @DisRightsUK https://t.co/BkHgxUrrWR

  • Mashup Score: 2

    Clinical research is being contaminated by flawed or biased evidence, which negatively impacts daily evidence based clinical practice, write Fuchen Liu and colleagues As clinicians, we navigate complex decision making in our daily clinical practice. These decisions are based on our expertise, guided by clinical guidelines, and grounded in the most up-to-date evidence. An important part of evidence based medicine involves critically appraising emerging evidence from clinical trials and systematic reviews to provide valuable insights that inform clinical decision making. Research by our team published in The BMJ explores the potential contamination of evidence by problematic trials within the evidence ecosystem.1 Through this work, we aimed to understand how flawed or biased trials could distort the broader body of evidence. This project offered a sobering realisation: evidence contamination is an escalating issue that undermines the reliability of current evidence. This growing challeng

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • "Contaminated evidence cascades into clinical practice guidelines, amplifying its negative impact nearly ninefold." Problematic trials are contaminating the evidence ecosystem https://t.co/M24JspjLgU

  • Mashup Score: 1

    Ruthie Jeanneret and Stevie Martin consider how requirements for prospective approval affect access to assisted dying Access to assisted dying is being considered in several countries, and the Isle of Man recently became the first part of the British Isles to approve it. In England and Wales, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill passed its second reading in the UK House of Commons in November 2024 and has undergone detailed examination (and extensive amendment) in the committee stage. Given increasing public support in England and Wales,1 discourse has shifted from the permissibility of assisted dying towards how it should be regulated, including appropriate balancing of safety and access. The bill’s proposer, Kim Leadbeater MP, says it has “the strictest safeguards anywhere in the world.”2 The bill is limited to self-administered death (assisted suicide) for mentally capable adults with a terminal illness who are expected to die from their illness within six months. People wit

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Strict safeguards in the England and Wales assisted dying bill include a requirement for prospective approval. @JeanneretRuthie and Stevie Martin consider how this requirement could affect access to assisted dying https://t.co/Hz45A9ssl3

  • Mashup Score: 2

    Enshittification was Macquarie Dictionary’s word of the year in 2024 and is relevant to the decline of health services with increased privatisation, write Fran Baum , Julia Anaf , and Paul Laris A new word—“enshittification”—has entered the English language that describes the gradual deterioration of a service or product. This process happens as a result of a reduction in the quality of service provided due to profit seeking by private companies. Cory Doctorow first came up with the term to describe how social media platforms exploit their users and ultimately decay.1 Doctorow argues, the “pre-enshittification” era was not a time of better leadership, but the worst impulses of corporations were checked by competition, regulation, action taken by users, and worker power. However, these constraints are being eroded as worker rights are undermined and trade unions are restricted, and the worst impulses of corporations are left unchecked. As such, a general feeling exists that things are g

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • UK government & @DHSCgovuk must protect @NHSEngland by rejecting further privatisation https://t.co/UeFg5ddJ0e via @baumfran et al

  • Mashup Score: 29

    A “culture of blame” often discourages NHS doctors and other staff from speaking up about the effects of fatigue on the safety of patients, a report has warned. The Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) said that fatigue among healthcare staff contributed directly and indirectly to patient harm but was not routinely captured or considered in patient safety event reporting or learning reviews. In a report detailing the findings of its investigation into the issue,1 the agency warned that fatigue in healthcare was often misunderstood and viewed as a staff wellbeing issue rather than a critical patient or staff safety risk. The report’s authors found, through interviews, site visits, and data analysis, that healthcare staff in England were wary of speaking up for fear of disciplinary …

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • A “culture of blame” often discourages NHS doctors and other staff from speaking up about the effects of fatigue on the safety of patients, a report has warned https://t.co/mYLoNXn3nD

  • Mashup Score: 13

    Flawed evidence risks harming patients Scientific integrity is fundamental not only for the development of science but also to allow society to trust the scientific community and research. However, the number of retractions has skyrocketed in recent years.12 Pressure to publish, combined with negligent editorial practices by journals or publishers, paves the way for bad science. This situation is compounded by the rise of relatively new types of scientific misconduct, such as paper mills—organisations that mass produce scientific manuscripts, often with fabricated or duplicated data, and then sell them to researchers.3 Retractions can have real consequences in healthcare, as Xu and colleagues have clearly demonstrated in a linked study (doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-082068).4 The results of retracted papers in healthcare may lead to decisions that do harm, claim false benefits, or in any case lack the desired effect. Xu and colleagues have quantified how retracted clinical trials affect the res

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Retractions can have real consequences in healthcare and flawed evidence risks harming patients, write @CristinaCandal and Alberto Ruano-Ravina https://t.co/qSqb4lGo3R

  • Mashup Score: 35

    Judith Steel was pivotal in enabling women with diabetes to have safe pregnancies and give birth to healthy babies. She recognised that the increased rates of obstetric complications and congenital abnormalities in women with diabetes and their babies were not an inevitable consequence of the disease—they could be mitigated through control of blood sugar, not only during but also pre-pregnancy. In 1976 Steel and obstetrician Frank Johnstone set up what is thought to be the first pre-pregnancy diabetes clinic at the Simpson Memorial Pavilion in Edinburgh. Because it was recognised that early gestation was the time when congenital abnormalities occurred, targeting women before they became pregnant was key. Women between the ages of 14 and 40 were invited to attend a clinic where pregnancy and the importance of control of diabetes through medication and diet were discussed. A paper on the first five years of the clinic highlighted the difficulties women faced—motivation was initially high

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Obituary for Judith Steel (1940-2025): founder of a pre-pregnancy diabetes clinic that led to lower rates of congenital abnormalities. Steel recognised that women with diabetes could give birth to healthy babies with the right advice and monitoring https://t.co/sqHJsSCgms

  • Mashup Score: 13

    US citizens seeking information about covid-19 on the government’s official covid websites are now redirected to a page asserting that the coronavirus was leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China, and condemning the former US covid adviser Anthony Fauci. The Covid.gov website used to offer US citizens information on how to stay safe from the novel coronavirus and help people stay up to date with their vaccinations. But as of 18 April, visitors to the page found the usual information replaced by a landing page with an image of Donald Trump over a backdrop of the words “LAB LEAK.” “By nearly …

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • US citizens seeking information about covid-19 on the government’s official covid websites are now redirected to a page asserting that the coronavirus was leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China, and condemning the former US covid adviser Anthony Fauci https://t.co/t81IuTCqVV