-
Mashup Score: 5A realist review of medication optimisation of community dwelling service users with serious mental illness - 1 year(s) ago
Background Severe mental illness (SMI) incorporates schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, non-organic psychosis, personality disorder or any other severe and enduring mental health illness. Medication, particularly antipsychotics and mood stabilisers are the main treatment options. Medication optimisation is a hallmark of medication safety, characterised by the use of collaborative, person-centred approaches. There is very little published research describing medication optimisation with people living with SMI. Objective Published literature and two stakeholder groups were employed to answer: What works for whom and in what circumstances to optimise medication use with people living with SMI in the community? Methods A five-stage realist review was co-conducted with a lived experience group of individuals living with SMI and a practitioner group caring for individuals with SMI. An initial programme theory was developed. A formal literature search was conducted across eight bibliographic dat
Source: qualitysafety.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, General HCPsTweet
-
Mashup Score: 1Quality and reporting of large-scale improvement programmes: a review of maternity initiatives in the English NHS, 2010–2023 - 1 year(s) ago
Background Large-scale improvement programmes are a frequent response to quality and safety problems in health systems globally, but have mixed impact. The extent to which they meet criteria for programme quality, particularly in relation to transparency of reporting and evaluation, is unclear. Aim To identify large-scale improvement programmes focused on intrapartum care implemented in English National Health Service maternity services in the period 2010–2023, and to conduct a structured quality assessment. Methods We drew on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidance to inform the design and reporting of our study. We identified relevant programmes using multiple search strategies of grey literature, research databases and other sources. Programmes that met a prespecified definition of improvement programme, that focused on intrapartum care and that had a retrievable evaluation report were subject to structured assess
Source: qualitysafety.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, Hem/OncsTweet
-
Mashup Score: 2Patient safety in remote primary care encounters: multimethod qualitative study combining Safety I and Safety II analysis - 1 year(s) ago
Background Triage and clinical consultations increasingly occur remotely. We aimed to learn why safety incidents occur in remote encounters and how to prevent them. Setting and sample UK primary care. 95 safety incidents (complaints, settled indemnity claims and reports) involving remote interactions. Separately, 12 general practices followed 2021–2023. Methods Multimethod qualitative study. We explored causes of real safety incidents retrospectively (‘Safety I’ analysis). In a prospective longitudinal study, we used interviews and ethnographic observation to produce individual, organisational and system-level explanations for why safety and near-miss incidents (rarely) occurred and why they did not occur more often (‘Safety II’ analysis). Data were analysed thematically. An interpretive synthesis of why safety incidents occur, and why they do not occur more often, was refined following member checking with safety experts and lived experience experts. Results Safety incidents were char
Source: qualitysafety.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, Hem/OncsTweet
-
Mashup Score: 0DOI Not Found | BMJ Quality & Safety - 2 year(s) ago
No resource with that DOI could be found on this site. Sending you to the original source in 8. You may also click
Source: qualitysafety.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine Journals and Societies, Latest HeadlinesTweet
-
Mashup Score: 0Did the Acute Frailty Network improve outcomes for older people living with frailty? A staggered difference-in-difference panel event study - 2 year(s) ago
Objectives To evaluate whether the Acute Frailty Network (AFN) was more effective than usual practice in supporting older people living with frailty to return home from hospital sooner and healthier. Design Staggered difference-in-difference panel event study allowing for differential effects across intervention cohorts. Setting All English National Health Service (NHS) acute hospital sites. Participants All 1 410 427 NHS patients aged 75+ with high frailty risk who had an emergency hospital admission to acute, general or geriatric medicine departments between 1 January 2012 and 31 March 2019. Intervention Membership of the AFN, a quality improvement collaborative designed to support acute hospitals in England deliver evidence-based care for older people with frailty. 66 hospital sites joined the AFN in six sequential cohorts, the first starting in January 2015, the sixth in May 2018. Usual care was delivered in the remaining 248 control sites. Main outcome measures Length of hospital
Source: qualitysafety.bmj.comCategories: Hem/Oncs, Latest HeadlinesTweet
-
Mashup Score: 0‘Bad apples’: time to redefine as a type of systems problem? - 2 year(s) ago
The patient safety movement of the early 21st century rode into town on the ‘systems’ horse. The Institute of Medicine report confidently declared that ‘The problem is not bad people; the problem is that the system needs to be made safer.’1 Recognising humans as inherently fallible, advocates for patient safety proposed that it was wrong to blame individual clinicians for poorly designed systems that were full of error traps.2 Iconic examples—such as administration of vincristine via the wrong route—were used to show how punishing doctors one at a time did nothing to prevent catastrophic errors from recurring.2 ,3 Individual blame was, therefore, deemed the wrong solution to the problem of patient safety; as long as specific individuals were deemed culpable, the significance of other hazards would go unnoticed. The systems approach sought to make better diagnosis and treatment of where the real causes of patient safety problems lay: in the ‘latent conditions’ of healthcare organisation
Source: qualitysafety.bmj.comCategories: Hem/Oncs, Latest HeadlinesTweet
-
Mashup Score: 1Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA - 2 year(s) ago
Background Diagnostic errors cause substantial preventable harms worldwide, but rigorous estimates for total burden are lacking. We previously estimated diagnostic error and serious harm rates for key dangerous diseases in major disease categories and validated plausible ranges using clinical experts. Objective We sought to estimate the annual US burden of serious misdiagnosis-related harms (permanent morbidity, mortality) by combining prior results with rigorous estimates of disease incidence. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of US-based nationally representative observational data. We estimated annual incident vascular events and infections from 21.5 million (M) sampled US hospital discharges (2012–2014). Annual new cancers were taken from US-based registries (2014). Years were selected for coding consistency with prior literature. Disease-specific incidences for 15 major vascular events, infections and cancers (‘Big Three’ categories) were multiplied by literature-based rates to der
Source: qualitysafety.bmj.comCategories: Hem/Oncs, Latest HeadlinesTweet
Research finds #peerSupport vital for those taking medication for #severeMentalIllness @astonuniversity @BMJ_Qual_Saf https://t.co/OqtbzOiyNy https://t.co/SW9fQW5oUD